Why 3D/4D Data will only increase in importance

Artificial intelligence has grown quickly in recent years, but its performance is still tied to the quality and type of data that feeds it. In benchmark tests on the nuScenes dataset, next-generation 4D LiDAR systems achieved up to a 60% reduction in geometric error and over 50% improvement in temporal coherence compared with earlier 3D data approaches. [1]
Text and images provided the foundation for today’s large language models, but the next frontier is spatial data that reflects the physical world with precision. Modern AI systems increasingly rely on spatial data, and the most important categories here are 3D and 4D datasets, which capture not only the structure of an environment but also its changes over time. These are typically inputs gathered from Lidar scanners, converted into point cloud representations, and processed into formats that autonomous systems such as cars, drones, or industrial robots can use. 3D and 4D data form the backbone of how autonomous systems see and interpret data, as well as act on it. Without them AI cannot function in environments where accuracy and safety matter. The shift toward these higher-dimensional datasets changes how we think about both opportunity and risk. If 2D data powered a generation of digital assistants, 3D and 4D data will power machines that navigate roads, skies, and production lines.

Why High Quality 3D/4D Data Matters

The stakes in 3D/4D data are higher than in any other form of AI training. A chatbot hallucinating a source is a problem, but a self-driving car hallucinating a pedestrian is a disaster. Fundamentally, 3D data uses structures like point clouds to depict objects and environments in depth. A digital twin of the surroundings is created by mapping the positions of objects in relation to space using Lidar scanners and other sensors to create each point cloud. These datasets capture how objects move, change, and interact in real-world situations when they are expanded into 4D, adding the dimension of time. For systems that need to anticipate rather than just perceive, like self-driving cars that anticipate a pedestrian crossing, this temporal extension is essential. The challenge lies both in the size of the datasets needed, as well as  in making sure they are accurately verified and structured. 

Want to stay ahead of the curve in AI training data? Subscribe to our newsletter for updates on Proof of Quality and 3D/4D initiatives!

Data Quality as the Real Bottleneck

AI models working with 3D/4D datasets are only as reliable as the data itself. When a point cloud is misclassified or when the temporal flow of 4D data is inconsistent, autonomous systems make the wrong calls. The consequences are real-world damage, not just flawed outputs. This makes data quality the defining bottleneck for scaling these systems safely. However, quality cannot be retrofitted after the fact; it must be guaranteed during collection, annotation, and validation. When implemented in production systems, a minor inaccuracy in a 4D dataset can have a domino effect. That is why the focus on quality assurance in this domain is existential.

Practical Applications Beyond the Lab

Autonomous driving cars are the most visible application of 3D/4D data, but they are not the only one. Robotics in warehouses, drones in agriculture, humanoid systems in elder care, and manufacturing systems in precision assembly all depend on spatial awareness. The common thread across these domains is that low-quality training data leads directly to real-world errors. A robot arm trained on poor-quality spatial annotations may fail to recognize a human operator nearby. A drone misclassifying terrain from a noisy Lidar scan can crash. The demand for 3D/4D data will not fade after the current wave of AI enthusiasm. Even when today’s language models reach saturation, the need for spatial intelligence will continue to grow. Cars, drones, and robots will be rolling off production lines for decades, each requiring massive amounts of training data to operate safely. Quality in this domain is not optional; it is the foundation of deployment.

Why Proof of Quality Fits 3D/4D Workflows

Sapien’s Proof of Quality protocol is uniquely suited to enforce standards in 3D/4D environments. Peer validation distributes review across the network, allowing high-reputation contributors to validate complex tasks like point cloud segmentation or motion annotation. Decentralized Quality assurance transforms what was once a centralized, operations-heavy QA bottleneck into an open, verifiable, and scalable system. For data scientists working on Lidar-driven perception models, this means that the datasets used for those models have an extra layer of enforcement that guarantees quality from the ground up, which lowers error rates and speeds up model training. This is how we bridge the gap between global contributor participation and enterprise-grade trust in AI training data.

FAQ: 3D/4D Data and Sapien

What is 3D/4D data in AI?
3D data represents the spatial structure of an environment using tools like Lidar scanners and point clouds, while 4D extends this to include time, capturing motion and change across sequences.

Why is data quality so important in 3D/4D?
Low-quality data can result in dangerous real-world outcomes, such as an autonomous car failing to detect a pedestrian. High accuracy is non-negotiable.

How does Sapien improve 3D/4D data quality?
Sapien uses a Proof of Quality protocol based on staking, peer validation, and reputation systems to enforce accuracy and accountability at scale.

Where is 3D/4D data used today?
Industries like autonomous driving, robotics, drones, aviation, and manufacturing all rely on 3D/4D data to operate safely and efficiently.

How can I start with Sapien?
Schedule a consultation with our team to discuss enterprise-grade 3D/4D data solutions.